donderdag 6 februari 2014
The Koyal Training Group, How to pay off multiple credit cards
Dear Liz: I'm confused
about paying
down credit card debt. Some say to pay the lowest-balance cards first and
others say the highest balance or the one with the highest interest. I have
almost $16,000 on credit cards ranging from a $4,930 balance on a card with an
8.24% interest rate to $660 on a card with an 18% rate.
Answer: Actually, the
first question you should ask is "How much credit card debt do I have
compared to my income?" If your balances equal half or more of your annual
earnings, you may not be able to pay it all off. You should make appointments
with a legitimate credit counselor (such as one affiliated with the National
Foundation for Credit Counseling at http://www.nfcc.org) and a bankruptcy
attorney (referrals from the National Assn. of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys at
http://www.nacba.org).
If
your situation isn't that dire, the fastest way out of debt is to pay the
minimums on your lower-rate cards and send as much money as possible to your
highest-rate card. Once that's paid off, concentrate on paying off the
next-highest-rate card, and so on. Some people instead like to target balances
from smallest to largest to get a quicker feeling of victory, but you typically
pay more in interest with that approach.
Ranking credit
card firms
Dear Liz: My wife and I
have had our bank's airline cards a long time, but we want to change because
it's become almost impossible to cash in the miles. What I don't see in various
card-comparison articles are ratings of the card issuers for customer service
and fraud protection.
Our bank has been quite good at both, but what about the other issuers?
Answer: People are
often unduly impressed when their credit card issuers contact them frequently
about possibly fraudulent charges. The issuers are the only ones at risk in
these situations, since under "zero liability" policies you can't be
held responsible for bogus charges. Also, if their software were better, they
might do a better job of separating legitimate from fraudulent transactions and
have to bother you less.
In
any case, it's tough to tell as a customer how good the issuer's fraud
prevention measures are. So perhaps a better metric to use is customer service,
and J.D. Power publishes an annual credit card satisfaction study that tries to
gauge six factors: interaction; credit card terms; billing and payment;
rewards; benefits and services; and problem resolution. American Express has
ranked at the top of the survey every year since it started seven years ago.
Discover ranked second for 2013 and Chase ranked third.
Who doesn't
offer a 401(k) match?
Dear Liz: As a CPA
financial advisor to individuals and small businesses, I devour your column.
It's almost always spot on. But the first sentence of your advice to the person
whose 401(k) doesn't offer a match — "start looking for a better job"
— was not, and you missed an opportunity to educate your readers in how to
compare job compensation.
I
encourage my small-business and wage-earning clients to adopt a "total
compensation" view to evaluate labor costs and to talk wages with their
employees or employers. Employer A offering $100,000 might be better, worse or
equal to Employer B offering $70,000 plus retirement plan match and, more
importantly, employer-subsidized family health insurance. Besides the intangible factor
of job satisfaction, one just doesn't know which employer's total financial
compensation is "better" without crunching the numbers before and
after tax. The two companies might be different only in philosophy of how
compensation is paid, not better or worse.
Answer: Some jobs come
with pensions or pay so good that the lack of a company 401(k) match is all but
irrelevant. It's safe to say those jobs are not in the majority. The median
full-time wage at the end of last year was under $44,000, which means half of
all workers earned less. Given stagnant incomes and rising costs, many workers
have a tough time saving, so the extra help provided by a company match can
make a world of difference in their ability to achieve a comfortable
retirement.
Nine
out of 10 employers that have a 401(k) offer a match, according to
PlanSponsor.com, so plans that don't are definitely outliers. The most common
match is now 100%, or one dollar for each dollar contributed, up to 6% of the
worker's salary, according to the most recent Aon Hewitt study. Nineteen
percent of the employers surveyed offered this match, up from 10% in 2011. The
most common match used to be 50 cents for each dollar contributed up to 6% of
salary.
Clearly,
more employers are getting the message that good company matches are an
excellent way to signal that they care about their employees' futures.
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten